Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Katex for mathjax #3094

Closed
amilapsn opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Katex for mathjax #3094

amilapsn opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@amilapsn
Copy link

No description provided.

@XavierOwen
Copy link

Thanks, jupyter notebook team.
And there has long been a problem that it takes a lot of time to render MathJax expression.
And I just get to know about this KaTeX.
And it is really fast, Lightning-fast.
And I believe that Jupyter would be better with KaTeX implemented.
So is it possible that in future release KaTeX would be available to use in Jupyter Notebook?
Or maybe works as an alternative to MathJax?
Thanks!

@ian-r-rose
Copy link
Member

KaTeX rendering is available in JupyterLab by installing the labextension @jupyterlab/katex-extension, FYI.

@XavierOwen
Copy link

KaTeX rendering is available in JupyterLab by installing the labextension @jupyterlab/katex-extension, FYI.

Thanks! I'll try it now.

@XavierOwen
Copy link

Err, way too hard to get many extensions go with the current version of jupyterLab...
Gotta rest for a while 😂
Cheers!

@jtpio
Copy link
Member

jtpio commented Jun 21, 2023

KaTeX rendering is available in JupyterLab by installing the labextension @jupyterlab/katex-extension, FYI.

Closing as this extension can also be used with Notebook 7 now.

Thanks!

@jtpio jtpio closed this as completed Jun 21, 2023
@jtpio jtpio added this to the 7.0 milestone Jun 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 21, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants