Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Catch up for ActiveWhatever 4.1.1 series #40

Closed
resistorsoftware opened this issue May 8, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

Catch up for ActiveWhatever 4.1.1 series #40

resistorsoftware opened this issue May 8, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@resistorsoftware
Copy link

When upgrading to Active* 4.1.1 my bundle quits on jwt 0.1.12 not being found.
For now I am adding this to my Gemfile:

 gem "jwt",  "0.1.12", :git => 'https://github.com/progrium/ruby-jwt.git', :tag => 'jwt-0.1.12'  

Any idea when this gem will hit rubygems at that version?

@progrium
Copy link
Contributor

progrium commented May 8, 2014

I don't think they should be using 0.1.12 since it was released and yanked not long after. However, I'll see if I can release 0.1.11 as 0.1.12 to resolve this issue.

@resistorsoftware
Copy link
Author

All I could find in my updated bundle was jwt (~> 0.1.8) for oAuth2 gem... wish it was clearer what gem was borking on needing 0.1.12 of jwt

@progrium
Copy link
Contributor

progrium commented May 8, 2014

Well I can't re-release a gem that was already released and yanked. So I
can't easily fix this. The problem is somewhere there is a Gemfile.lock
that is explicitly using 0.1.12

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:32 PM, David Lazar notifications@github.comwrote:

All I could find in my updated bundle was jwt (~> 0.1.8) for oAuth2 gem...
wish it was clearer what gem was borking on needing 0.1.12 of jwt


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/40#issuecomment-42587322
.

Jeff Lindsay
http://progrium.com

@kiwimanman
Copy link

You could release 0.1.11 as 0.1.13 so those with 0.1.12 in Gemfile.lock's can bundle update and get a working version.

@progrium
Copy link
Contributor

progrium commented May 9, 2014

Good idea. That worked. Done.

@olimart
Copy link

olimart commented May 9, 2014

@progrium Thanks Jeff. Problem solved.

@excpt excpt closed this as completed Jan 26, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants