You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes and no. At the time I evaluated Vinyl and other alternatives, and it
made sense to do something else due to the many tricky instances that need
to be provided, type inference, and also because I'm not a big fan of
buying into Vinyl or any of the competing alternatives. In related news,
I'm actually thinking of revamping records internally to use Vector
instead, which should lead to a more efficient runtime, but also to more
efficient compilation times with enough type level tricks which are usually
not possible with an inductive data type such as the current HList.
On Jan 5, 2017 14:32, "Joe Hermaszewski" <notifications@github.com> wrote:
It seems as though PgR and Rec are very similar. It might reduce friction
at the edges of this library to use the more widespread Vinyl.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#14>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAM5mOv7_RWPVynpk8TiOXUyD5XeY4Hks5rPPD2gaJpZM4LbsNj>
.
It seems as though
PgR
andRec
are very similar. It might reduce friction at the edges of this library to use the more widespreadVinyl
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: