Ensure remotedialer kubelet connections use kubelet bind address

[brandond]

Proposed Changes

Ensure that connections to the kubelet through the egress-selector (either local or via remotedialer) use the correct kubelet bind address.

We have long overridden the kubelet address to the loopback address when dialing via the remotedialer tunnel, and ensured that the kubelet always binds to an ipv4 or ipv6 wildcard address. We broke this in #10019 when we wired the --bind-address flag up to the kubelet --address flag by way of the ListenAddress field.

This is blocked on:

• Allow passing a custom client-side dialer rancher/remotedialer#80

Types of Changes

bugfix

Verification

1. Set --bind-address on a server or agent node
2. Note that kubectl logs works properly to retrieve logs from pods on that node

Testing

Linked Issues

• Not able to connect to kubelet when using bind-address flag #10444

User-Facing Change

Fixed an issue where setting the `--bind-address` flag to a non-loopback or wildcard address would prevent `kubectl logs` from working properly.

Further Comments

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.57%. Comparing base (4204248) to head (b450ce5).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/agent/tunnel/tunnel.go	83.33%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/daemons/control/tunnel.go	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (4204248) and HEAD (b450ce5). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (4204248)	HEAD (b450ce5)
e2etests	7	6

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10480      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   47.16%   41.57%   -5.59%     
==========================================
  Files         177      177              
  Lines       14830    14839       +9     
==========================================
- Hits         6995     6170     -825     
- Misses       6532     7485     +953     
+ Partials     1303     1184     -119     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2etests	36.42% <75.00%> (-9.45%)	⬇️
inttests	19.91% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittests	11.33% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.