resourceRegistry need add scope="Cluster"

[yanfeng1992]

Signed-off-by: huangyanfeng huangyanfeng1992@gmail.com

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

When I generate the crd with the following command：controller-gen crd paths=./pkg/apis/search/v1alpha1/... output:crd:dir=./charts/_crds/bases

Generated a crd with the wrong scope

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

karmada-search: resourceRegistry type add scope="Cluster"

[karmada-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign kevin-wangzefeng after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @kevin-wangzefeng in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3084 (3d453c7) into master (28223cf) will increase coverage by 5.39%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3084      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.90%   43.30%   +5.39%     
==========================================
  Files         207      208       +1     
  Lines       19350    19429      +79     
==========================================
+ Hits         7335     8414    +1079     
+ Misses      11578    10550    -1028     
- Partials      437      465      +28     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	43.30% <ø> (+5.39%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/webhook/configuration/validating.go	71.42% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/registry/cluster/strategy.go	54.68% <0.00%> (ø)
...g/util/overridemanager/labelannotationoverrider.go	85.29% <0.00%> (+0.44%)	⬆️
pkg/karmadactl/cmdinit/kubernetes/deploy.go	7.53% <0.00%> (+4.27%)	⬆️
pkg/util/validation/validation.go	74.07% <0.00%> (+5.41%)	⬆️
pkg/util/overridemanager/overridemanager.go	48.62% <0.00%> (+25.22%)	⬆️
pkg/apis/cluster/mutation/mutation.go	98.11% <0.00%> (+91.82%)	⬆️
pkg/karmadactl/cmdinit/kubernetes/deployments.go	100.00% <0.00%> (+100.00%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

Hi @yanfeng1992, in Karmada, ResourceRegistry is registered through the Aggregation Layer.
May I ask, why do you need to generate a CRD?

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

ResourceRegistry is registered through the Aggregation Layer.

[yanfeng1992]

I misunderstood. In addition, did this PR #3044 finally come to a conclusion? @XiShanYongYe-Chang

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

I misunderstood. In addition, did this PR #3044 finally come to a conclusion? @XiShanYongYe-Chang

Let me take a look later.