Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Client-side MTOM/XOP support #77

Closed
phbaer opened this issue Mar 23, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Client-side MTOM/XOP support #77

phbaer opened this issue Mar 23, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@phbaer
Copy link
Contributor

phbaer commented Mar 23, 2016

Hi there,

this is actually not really an issue but should be considered more like a question: I've implemented quick-any-dirty, prove-of-concept-ish support for MTOM/XOP attachments in on the client side (phbaer@278cef4). It only uses the start attachment and ignores all the other if there are any. It even does not properly check the MIME types yet, so ... it's really just a POC. It works pretty well for my use case which is a very simple one without binary attachments (and actually currently only a single attachment; unfortunately, the service always replies with MTOM/XOP compression enabled).

My question is now: would you/KDAB be interested in client-side MTOM/XOP support?

Thanks and cheers, phb

@dfaure
Copy link
Contributor

dfaure commented Aug 16, 2016

Hello, sorry that I didn't reply earlier.

Yes, of course I'm interested in merging such a feature into KDSoap, there have been requests for it.

You would just have to sign a CLA form so that this contribution can be used by KDAB under the commercial license, for commercial customers -- much like all Qt contributors agree to the Qt Company's CLA. I can make this happen on our side if you're interested.

@phbaer
Copy link
Contributor Author

phbaer commented Apr 24, 2017

Also sorry for the late reply, was busy with other issues. We've worked around the MTOM/XOP issues and hence will not continue our efforts here. Sorry, but maybe someone else will eventually take care of that missing functionality.

@phbaer phbaer closed this as completed Apr 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants