You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After reading the paper, I have a question about pruning spans.
In section 5, the framework prunes the candidate spans during both training and evaluation. I think during evaluation is reasonable since the weights for word vectors are tuned.
But during the early stage of training, the weights for word vectors are not learned (e.g., random initialized in the first epoch), could keeping top lambda*T spans ordered by mention scores discard potential valid mentions?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
After reading the paper, I have a question about pruning spans.
In section 5, the framework prunes the candidate spans during both training and evaluation. I think during evaluation is reasonable since the weights for word vectors are tuned.
But during the early stage of training, the weights for word vectors are not learned (e.g., random initialized in the first epoch), could keeping top lambda*T spans ordered by mention scores discard potential valid mentions?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: