-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance #10
Comments
@bkj We are fine tuning and running the experiments on several benchmark datasets. The results should be ready in one month. |
@jhfjhfj1 any updates? Thanks :) |
Hi
Unlikely...i am just learning how to use github.... 😉
cheers!
Manuel Boissiere
…________________________________
From: Karan Dwivedi <notifications@github.com>
Sent: 03 August 2018 17:38
To: jhfjhfj1/autokeras
Cc: Subscribed
Subject: Re: [jhfjhfj1/autokeras] Performance (#10)
@jhfjhfj1<https://github.com/jhfjhfj1> any updates?
Thanks :)
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#10 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoHxvAtIR5ZRflgLn4YCaYmpWgfUXWC5ks5uNHyCgaJpZM4TahgY>.
|
Any updates here? I think it'd be good to add some rough performance numbers to the README so people can see expected results for debugging/comparison purposes. |
There's some results in their paper I think. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.10282.pdf |
Benchmarks would be nice, particularly w.r.t. text classification, which isn't in the original paper. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Hi --
Do you have any information about the expected performance of this project on standard benchmarks, eg MNIST or CIFAR10?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: