Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WideResNet architecture #49

Closed
LukeWood opened this issue Jan 20, 2022 · 12 comments
Closed

WideResNet architecture #49

LukeWood opened this issue Jan 20, 2022 · 12 comments

Comments

@LukeWood
Copy link
Contributor

Best resnet for Cifar10/Cifar100

https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07146

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor

bhack commented Jan 21, 2022

@MrinalTyagi
Copy link
Contributor

Would like to work on this.

@blackhat-coder
Copy link

Hi @LukeWood ,I would love to implement WideResNet duing GSoC. I'm currently drafting my proposal and would love to know if I could implement this during GSoC ?

@innat
Copy link
Contributor

innat commented Jul 3, 2022

Any update on this feature? cc @blackhat-coder

@blackhat-coder
Copy link

Hi @innat, This feature proposal wasn't accepted, however I can still work on implementing this architecture.

@innat
Copy link
Contributor

innat commented Jul 6, 2022

Do you mean, didn't accept in GSoC? If so, I don't think it's required to pass things in GSoC in order to be eligible to include in KerasCV. ( WideResNet is widely used with over 5288 citations. )

@DavidLandup0
Copy link
Contributor

Can you assign this to me as well? :)

@DavidLandup0
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@DavidLandup0
Copy link
Contributor

Small update, got to this last night, and I'm almost done (I think). Just gotta tweak a few things and test it thoroughly on different setups (they have a few listed in the paper)

@DavidLandup0
Copy link
Contributor

Seems to be done, just waiting for the training to finish to validate whether it behaves the same as in the paper. Sending the pull request in a few hours!

@LukeWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

LukeWood commented May 4, 2023

Lets deprioritize this until theres a strong use case; and focus on migrating the existing backbones!

@LukeWood LukeWood closed this as completed May 4, 2023
@innat
Copy link
Contributor

innat commented May 6, 2023

@LukeWood this network is cited by 6776 times, here is the pwc report.

freedomtan pushed a commit to freedomtan/keras-cv that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2023
* add base merge layer

* format docstrings

* add  layer

* add test cases for  layer

* Add import for  layer

* fix build function

* add dynamic and static tests

* fix pytest import

* fix pytest decorator

* remove batch size from dynamic shape test

* fix keras reference

* refactor test class

* fix tf tests, and linting issues
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants