samples/bpf: remove duplicate include #304
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: 4170bc6 |
Obviously, 'bpf/bpf.h' in 'samples/bpf/hbm.c' is duplicated. Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
|
Master branch: f055f35 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/378867=>bpf-next
branch
from
9581e4e
to
3373182
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378867 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2020
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2020
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
When testing send_signal and stacktrace_build_id_nmi using the riscv sbi
pmu driver without the sscofpmf extension or the riscv legacy pmu
driver, they encountered failures as follows:
test_send_signal_common:FAIL:perf_event_open unexpected perf_event_open: actual -1 < expected 0
#272/3 send_signal/send_signal_nmi:FAIL
test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL:perf_event_open err -1 errno 95
#304 stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL
The reason is that the above pmu driver or hardware does not support
sampling events, that is, PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is set to pmu
capabilities, and then perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP. Since
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is not only set in the riscv-related pmu
driver, it is better to skip testing when this capability is set.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
When testing send_signal and stacktrace_build_id_nmi using the riscv sbi
pmu driver without the sscofpmf extension or the riscv legacy pmu
driver, they encountered failures as follows:
test_send_signal_common:FAIL:perf_event_open unexpected perf_event_open: actual -1 < expected 0
#272/3 send_signal/send_signal_nmi:FAIL
test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL:perf_event_open err -1 errno 95
#304 stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL
The reason is that the above pmu driver or hardware does not support
sampling events, that is, PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is set to pmu
capabilities, and then perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP. Since
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is not only set in the riscv-related pmu
driver, it is better to skip testing when this capability is set.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
When testing send_signal and stacktrace_build_id_nmi using the riscv sbi
pmu driver without the sscofpmf extension or the riscv legacy pmu
driver, they encountered failures as follows:
test_send_signal_common:FAIL:perf_event_open unexpected perf_event_open: actual -1 < expected 0
#272/3 send_signal/send_signal_nmi:FAIL
test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL:perf_event_open err -1 errno 95
#304 stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL
The reason is that the above pmu driver or hardware does not support
sampling events, that is, PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is set to pmu
capabilities, and then perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP. Since
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is not only set in the riscv-related pmu
driver, it is better to skip testing when this capability is set.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
When testing send_signal and stacktrace_build_id_nmi using the riscv sbi
pmu driver without the sscofpmf extension or the riscv legacy pmu driver,
then failures as follows are encountered:
test_send_signal_common:FAIL:perf_event_open unexpected perf_event_open: actual -1 < expected 0
#272/3 send_signal/send_signal_nmi:FAIL
test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL:perf_event_open err -1 errno 95
#304 stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL
The reason is that the above pmu driver or hardware does not support
sampling events, that is, PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is set to pmu
capabilities, and then perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP. Since
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is not only set in the riscv-related pmu driver,
it is better to skip testing when this capability is set.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240402073029.1299085-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: samples/bpf: remove duplicate include
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378867