bpf: Fix missed var_off related to movsx in verifier #7207
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![kernel-patches-daemon-bpf[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/70728002?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Zac reported a verification failure and Alexei reproduced the issue
with a simple reproducer ([1]). The verification failure is due to missed
setting for var_off.
The following is the reproducer in [1]:
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387) ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
2: (36) if w7 >= 0x2533823b goto pc-3
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 2 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387)
2: R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
3: (b4) w0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
4: (95) exit
Note that after insn 1, the var_off for R7 is (0x0; 0x7f). This is not correct
since upper 24 bits of w7 could be 0 or 1. So correct var_off should be
(0x0; 0xffffffff). Missing var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val() caused later
incorrect analysis in zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) and reg_bounds_sync(dst_reg).
To fix the issue, set var_off correctly in set_sext32_default_val(). The correct
reg state after insn 1 becomes:
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=-128,smax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
and at insn 2, the verifier correctly determines either branch is possible.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLPU0Shz7dWV4bn2BgtGdxN3uFHPeobGBA72tpg5Xoykw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 8100928 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
In coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(), for the case where upper
sign extension bits are the same for smax32 and smin32
values, we missed to setup properly. This is especially
problematic if both smax32 and smin32's sign extension
bits are 1.
The following is a simple example illustrating the inconsistent
verifier states due to missed var_off:
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar()
1: (bf) r3 = r0 ; R0_w=scalar(id=1) R3_w=scalar(id=1)
2: (57) r3 &= 15 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=15,var_off=(0x0; 0xf))
3: (47) r3 |= 128 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=128,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=143,var_off=(0x80; 0xf))
4: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (alu): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f]
u32=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s32=[0x80, 0xffffff8f] var_off=(0x80, 0xf)
The var_off=(0x80, 0xf) is not correct, and the correct one should
be var_off=(0xffffff80; 0xf) since from insn 3, we know that at
insn 4, the sign extension bits will be 1. This patch fixed this
issue by setting var_off properly.
Fixes: 8100928 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Add three unit tests in verifier_movsx.c to cover cases where missed var_off setting can cause unexpected verification success or failure. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
|
Upstream branch: 143492f |
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
bot
force-pushed
the
bpf_base
branch
from
db04d9d
to
7d293b1
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=862298 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Fix missed var_off related to movsx in verifier
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=862298