Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2023. It is now read-only.

Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and progmem support for webserver #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2021

Conversation

tothtechnika
Copy link

As the title says I've fixed a couple of things. I hope it helps. 🙂

@khoih-prog khoih-prog self-requested a review December 15, 2021 03:25
@khoih-prog khoih-prog merged commit e308402 into khoih-prog:master Dec 15, 2021
@khoih-prog
Copy link
Owner

Hi @tothtechnika

Thanks for the PR and sorry for the delay as the PR is a little bit complicated and takes some time to have a look.

I merging the PR now, and will publish a new release soon with your contribution noted.

BR,

khoih-prog added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
### Releases v1.4.0

1. Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and add WebServer progmem support. Check PR [Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and progmem support for webserver #7](#7)
khoih-prog added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
### Releases v1.4.0

1. Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and add WebServer progmem support. Check PR [Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and progmem support for webserver #7](#7)
khoih-prog added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
### Releases v1.4.0

1. Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and add WebServer progmem support. Check PR [Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and progmem support for webserver #7](#7)
@khoih-prog
Copy link
Owner

Hi @tothtechnika

The new AsyncWebServer_STM32 releases v1.4.0 has just been published.

Your contribution has been noted in Contributions and Thanks.

Looking forward to receiving more of your PRs and bug reports.

Best Regards,


Releases v1.4.0

  1. Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and add WebServer progmem support. Check PR Fix base64 encoding of websocket client key and progmem support for webserver #7

@tothtechnika
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the review and merge!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants