Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weโ€™ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NT-1595: Creator view adjustments #1041

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 25, 2020

Conversation

Arkariang
Copy link
Contributor

๐Ÿ“ฒ What

  • Visual tweecks for the View Pledge screen, creator and backer perspective

๐Ÿ‘€ See

| Before ๐Ÿ› | After ๐Ÿฆ‹ |

  • The title of the creator View Pledge screen reads โ€œView pledgeโ€
  • The title of the reward is shown in the reward card

CREATOR-Perspective

  • The estimated delivery date of the reward is shown above the reward card when no reward in Backer perspective

BACKERNoReward-BackerPerspective

| --- | --- |
| | |

๐Ÿ“‹ QA

  • For the first two points log as a creator, go to a message from a backer and press the view pledge button on the ThreadMessages screen
  • For the last point pledge to any reward no reward, the go to the view pledge screen

Story ๐Ÿ“–

Android creator view pledge adjustments

@@ -65,8 +67,10 @@ class BackingFragment : BaseFragment<BackingFragmentViewModel.ViewModel>() {
.subscribe { setBackerImageView(it) }

this.viewModel.outputs.backerName()
.observeOn(io())
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@leighdouglas leighdouglas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@Arkariang Arkariang merged commit 4e002f3 into master Nov 25, 2020
@Arkariang Arkariang deleted the imartin/NT-1595-creator-view-adjustments branch November 25, 2020 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants