Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/user resizable facets panel #1063

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nyanofthemoon
Copy link
Contributor

I originally merged this PR unto vr.

@hlminh2000 How do we proceed to migrate something branched from vr unto next? I think the vr branch contains news changes from @ciaranschutte... ?

joneubank and others added 2 commits December 7, 2018 14:22
* 🚑 moves usernsap widget to bottom right (#909) (#985)

* Fix Contant Typo (#997)

* Remove unused reference

* Tighten up bounding box on File Icon SVG

* class -> className attribute correction in Participant Icon

* Add Secondary Nav as reusable component

* Chip reusable ui component

* Generic svg icon in circle reusable component

* Entity pages for file and participant

* Routing to entity pages

* Data Provider component for Arranger

* Add keys to EntityTitle chips

* Add convenient method exports to arranger service

* Add Arranger Data to Entity Pages

Uses terrible long query, which is too hard to maintain. Need to develop a better method of retrieving all data for a single entity from arranger - not a UI dev task, this is what is available ATM

* Absolute import paths, remove unused
@hlminh2000
Copy link
Contributor

can we drop the first commit from this PR? that should remain in vr :)

@nyanofthemoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Out of worry for the integrity of the code- I will wait for the next merge upwards from vr to next.

@nyanofthemoon nyanofthemoon deleted the feature/user-resizable-facets-panel branch May 13, 2019 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants