-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RHDM-2028] Deadlock between KieRepositoryImpl.kieModuleRepo and KieScannerHolder.kieScanner #56
Conversation
…cannerHolder.kieScanner
return KieScannerHolder.kieScanner.loadArtifact( releaseId, pomModel ); | ||
KieModule kieModule; | ||
synchronized (kieModuleRepo) { // Make sure kieModuleRepo lock is acquired before kieScanner lock | ||
kieModule = KieScannerHolder.kieScanner.loadArtifact(releaseId, pomModel); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensuring the lock order (kieModuleRepo -> kieScanner) is the basic solution for a deadlock. As I see, problematic scenario is only this place, so I solved with this small fix.
An alternative approach would be to create a ReentrantLock
and lock it for both kieModuleRepo
and KieScannerHolder.kieScanner
all usage. But it would require more code changes. Which do you prefer? > @mariofusco
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should replace all these synchronized
block with ReentrantLock
s, but this change can be done only on the main branch and it is not urgent however.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I'll do that for the main branch.
|
||
// This is TurtleTest. You can run this test with -PrunTurtleTests | ||
@Test | ||
public void concurrentBuildWithDependency() throws Exception { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I simulate the reported scenario and reproduce the deadlock with this test. However, this doesn't reproduce the deadlock in Drools 8 (upstream main), because ReleaseIdImpl usage is refactored and we no longer use ReleaseIdImpl.setSnapshotVersion
, so the scenario is not reproducible. It's a good thing, but I will likely forward-port the same fix without this unit test. I will still likely forward-port the same unit test to ensure that a deadlock doesn't happen with concurrent builds.
Ports
This is PR for 7.x
Potentially we may port it to 7.67.x
JIRA:
How to replicate CI configuration locally?
Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.
build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.
How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
for pull request checks
Please add comment: Jenkins retest this
for a specific pull request check
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] tests
for a full downstream build
run_fdb
a compile downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run cdb
a full production downstream build please add comment: Jenkins execute product fdb
an upstream build please add comment: Jenkins run upstream
for quarkus branch checks
Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch
for a quarkus branch specific check
Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-branch
for quarkus main checks
Run checks against Quarkus main branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main
for a specific quarkus main check
Run checks against Quarkus main branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-main
for quarkus lts checks
Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts
for a specific quarkus lts check
Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-lts
for native checks
Run native checks
Please add comment: Jenkins run native
for a specific native check
Run native checks
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native
for native lts checks
Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins run native-lts
for a specific native lts check
Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native-lts
How to backport a pull request to a different branch?
In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format
backport-<branch-name>
, where<branch-name>
is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g.,backport-7.67.x
to backport the original PR to the7.67.x
branch).Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.
If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.