You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a las file where one of the log values is -0.0733. When this is read in with null_policy="aggressive", the value is incorrectly parsed as the string NaN733, presumably because -0.0 is one of the values in NULL_POLICIES.
To avoid this unwanted behaviour, it would be useful if lasio checked that -0.0 was followed by a word boundary and not further digits.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This should be fixed by pull-request #429 "Change null_policy to handle small non-zero values", which is now merged. If you are working with the GitHub source, could you update to the latest Lasio code and see if your las file's log values are parsed properly when read with `null_policy="aggressive"?
I have a las file where one of the log values is
-0.0733
. When this is read in withnull_policy="aggressive"
, the value is incorrectly parsed as the stringNaN733
, presumably because-0.0
is one of the values inNULL_POLICIES
.To avoid this unwanted behaviour, it would be useful if lasio checked that
-0.0
was followed by a word boundary and not further digits.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: