Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add x86-64 musl #636

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 24, 2023
Merged

Add x86-64 musl #636

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 24, 2023

Conversation

mgautierfr
Copy link
Member

Fix #585

@kelson42
Copy link
Contributor

kelson42 commented Oct 8, 2023

@mgautierfr Does it fix openzim/libzim#820? CI is red, why?

@rgaudin
Copy link
Member

rgaudin commented Oct 10, 2023

@mgautierfr I am having same results as in openzim/libzim#820

@mgautierfr
Copy link
Member Author

With gcc10 I don't have the missing symbol. ldd is working correctly (tested on x86_64 only).

This is a clearer install and it simplify the base_deps archive creation.
This target fails on the CI because of conflict between the builded
libraries (lzma, libz) and native library.
As they are both for the same arch but with different libc, python tries
to load them and fails.

There is a real bug somewhere in our toolchain but we need to build for
x86_64 musl right now and this is done in `x86-64_musl_mixed` which pass.
So let's remove it for now.

(`x86-64_musl_dyn` fails with the docker image. It is ok with native
(fedora 38) system)
@mgautierfr mgautierfr merged commit d8757c3 into main Oct 24, 2023
40 checks passed
@mgautierfr mgautierfr deleted the musl branch October 24, 2023 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Publish libzim on arm64 musl
3 participants