Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Repace outdated pep257 by pydocstyle #66

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2016
Merged

Repace outdated pep257 by pydocstyle #66

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2016

Conversation

gmist
Copy link
Contributor

@gmist gmist commented Jul 12, 2016

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 12, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 77.292% when pulling 65f574a on gmist:pydocstyle into e9e926f on klen:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 12, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 77.292% when pulling 5f56ea2 on gmist:pydocstyle into e9e926f on klen:develop.

@klen klen merged commit 9b43d2a into klen:develop Sep 7, 2016
@klen
Copy link
Owner

klen commented Sep 7, 2016

Great, thank you!

@blueyed
Copy link
Contributor

blueyed commented Sep 7, 2016

Just for reference, there are some issues with pydocstyle, that's why I would still stick with pep257 currently.
PyCQA/pydocstyle#194
But not too bad probably.

@gmist gmist deleted the pydocstyle branch September 8, 2016 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@gmist @coveralls @klen @blueyed