-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add unlining pure functions #24
Add unlining pure functions #24
Conversation
These functions are: - singleUnderline - doubleUnderline - noUnderline
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know why your PR is still not approved? Because I chose not to approve it. But they will.
50284a1
to
59830e2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neat work! I have only minor doc comment 👍
{-# SPECIALIZE singleUnderline :: Text #-} | ||
{-# SPECIALIZE singleUnderline :: ByteString #-} | ||
|
||
-- | Code to apply __doubleUnderline__ emphasis for the terminal output. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have checked ansi-terminal
docs, and it states that double underline doesn't work for Windows. Could you please also add this to the docs in here? 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I've added that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool! Thanks 👍
Resolves #7