Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scan{l,r}1 #234

Closed
argantos opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #276
Closed

scan{l,r}1 #234

argantos opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #276
Assignees
Labels
reexport Reexport something new

Comments

@argantos
Copy link

argantos commented Dec 3, 2019

Why are scanl1 and scanr1 missing? They are not partial.

@chshersh chshersh added the reexport Reexport something new label Dec 3, 2019
@chshersh
Copy link
Contributor

chshersh commented Dec 3, 2019

@argantos No particular reason. We happen never to use scan{l,r}[1] so these functions were not considered for addition at first place. I don't mind adding scanl1 and scanr1 to relude as well since these functions are already reexported by relude. Maybe we can even add scanl' as a more efficient version of scanl.

@chshersh chshersh added this to the v0.7.0.0: Refiner milestone Feb 25, 2020
@vrom911 vrom911 self-assigned this May 11, 2020
vrom911 added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2020
vrom911 added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2020
chshersh pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
reexport Reexport something new
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants