Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd originally opened this as #13 ages ago, back before this library updated to tcell.
I picked it up again while updating dependencies in my fork.
In the original PR, we'd talked about encapsulating the set of colors in go-fuzzyfinder to avoid leaking the underlying terminal library through to the option struct. Looking at tcell, I'm not sure I see a way to cleanly do that. Because tcell is basically taking a uint64, and is itself already supporting any standard / xterm color, the set of colors it accepts is massive. I could make the function take a uint64 and cast it, but that doesn't actually feel cleaner: I'd be leaking tcell's methodology but in a less clear way.
Curious for your thoughts.