Turn the remove-namespace kustomize function into a proper function. #388
Conversation
* Use a client side CRD so we can easily add more types for which we need to remove the namespace. * Package it in the same docker image as our image-prefix kpt function. Fix GoogleCloudPlatform/kubeflow-distribution#27
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
This change is |
|
Not ready for review but creating a PR so I don't forget about it. |
|
/assign @Bobgy This is ready for review. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
|
@jlewi: you cannot LGTM your own PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Bobgy, jlewi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…ubeflow#388) * Use a client side CRD so we can easily add more types for which we need to remove the namespace. * Package it in the same docker image as our image-prefix kpt function. Fix GoogleCloudPlatform/kubeflow-distribution#27
Use a client side CRD so we can easily add more types
for which we need to remove the namespace.
Package it in the same docker image as our image-prefix kpt function.
Fix GoogleCloudPlatform/kubeflow-distribution#27