Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize docker compilation time #193

Merged

Conversation

alberthuang24
Copy link
Contributor

Better use of docker layer cache

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 10, 2021
@@ -56,6 +40,21 @@ RUN chown root:root /etc/apt/sources.list.d/microsoft-prod.list
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get install -yy -q dotnet-hosting-2.0.8

ARG OPENAPI_GENERATOR_COMMIT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does moving the ARGs affect the caching? I feel like it is clearer if they are at the top.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the documentation, when the ARG layer is changed, all the following layers of the cache will invalidate.

Reference:

https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#impact-on-build-caching
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41593135/does-putting-arg-at-top-of-dockerfile-prevent-layer-re-use

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, thanks for the explanation.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

One small, otherwise looks good.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, HongjiangHuang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 13ed3b4 into kubernetes-client:master Jun 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants