-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
self-updating deployments #11
Comments
The Omaha thingie could probably just be a sidecar that takes a deployment and can only update the tag of the spec.container.image. |
Self-updating makes me nervous. It is somewhat antithetical to hermetic On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Brandon Philips notifications@github.com
|
@philips wouldn't it be better to use the API? For example, we could consider a cron job type of sidecar that is able to update image in a deployment spec. However, having said this, would Spartakus benefit from such functionality in significant way really? |
@errordeveloper sure, the cron job needs to talk to Omaha or something that tells it what version to run though. Cron jobs aren't ideal because you want exponential backoffs. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
It would be great if spartakus would be able to update its own deployment and ideally we could roll out the update in a controlled manner with a feedback loop. Also, it would be cool if people could subscribe to alpha/beta/stable reporting channels.
We are building something that plugs into an Omaha server for the etcd and Prometheus Operator. Would that be OK for spartakus?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: