Fix the kube-bench 1.2.20 to enhance security #9939
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: yankay The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
cncf-cla: yes
|
Thanks @yankay :D |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
floryut
added
the
kind/feature
pedro-peter
pushed a commit
to pedro-peter/kubespray
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix kube-bench check Fail 1.2.20 by increase the default value of audit_log_maxbackups
Ref to https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/blob/main/cfg/cis-1.24/master.yaml#L627
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #9933
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: