Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KEP-2527: KEP (spec vs. status) is implemented #3121

Conversation

thockin
Copy link
Member

@thockin thockin commented Jan 10, 2022

Fixes #2527

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory labels Jan 10, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. label Jan 10, 2022
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 10, 2022

/lgtm
/approve

CI complaining about missing PRR files, which don't make sense for a process/doc KEP

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 10, 2022

/hold to prevent auto-retest spam until the PRR file failure is resolved

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Jan 10, 2022
@thockin thockin force-pushed the 2527-clarify-status-observations-vs-rbac branch from c93ee77 to afc1e2d Compare January 22, 2022 03:57
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 22, 2022
@thockin thockin removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 22, 2022
@thockin
Copy link
Member Author

thockin commented Jan 22, 2022

ping @johnbelamaric for a trivial PRR (this is a docs-only change)

@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Mar 9, 2022

If this was implemented for v1.23, did we already update docs accordingly?

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Mar 9, 2022

yes, xref kubernetes/community#5842

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 7, 2022
@thockin thockin removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 6, 2022
@thockin
Copy link
Member Author

thockin commented Jul 6, 2022

Ping on this - it has been implemented for a while now, just needs an approve to finish

@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Jul 11, 2022

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 11, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 9, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Nov 8, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@johnbelamaric: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johnbelamaric, liggitt, thockin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7c97898 into kubernetes:master Jul 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.31 milestone Jul 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify or remove the "status is only observations" rule
6 participants