-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-4396: promote kep into implementable #4482
KEP-4396: promote kep into implementable #4482
Conversation
HirazawaUi
commented
Feb 6, 2024
- One-line PR description: promote kep 4396 into implementable
- Issue link: Allow almost all printable ASCII characters in environment variables #4369
- Other comments:
Do I need to close #4478 and merge it into the current PR and submit it together? |
PRR looks OK for alpha /approve |
/assign @mrunalp |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: HirazawaUi, jpbetz, mrunalp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@@ -29,6 +28,8 @@ latest-milestone: "v1.30" | |||
# The milestone at which this feature was, or is targeted to be, at each stage. | |||
milestone: | |||
alpha: "v1.30" | |||
beta: "v1.32" | |||
stable: "v1.36" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
36 is rather pessimistic, don't you think :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the goal is to soak the compatibility into all supported k8s versions, this might make sense? I don't know if that was the thinking here..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the goal is to soak the compatibility into all supported k8s versions, this might make sense
Yes, the intention is to have the beta version span four release cycle (the maximum range of version skew for our different components) to avoid compatibility issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is WAY more than we normally do for introducing new features
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For ratcheting, soak time can be counted starting at the initial alpha, because we always introduce "tolerate if read from storage" then. And that's what matters when soaking. So if we go to stable one release after beta (v1.33), we still have a full support soak window.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the reminder, I will modify it to version v1.33 later.