-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Building cluster in existing VPC takes over VPC and IGW #3203
Comments
Any update on this issue? Can we close? |
I'm still seeing this issue |
Hi @danieljamesscott, which version of the Kops binary are you using? Can you provide a snippet of the |
So it's showing that it will change the name of the gateway. For the SSH key, I created the cluster with no ssh key, then added an 'sshKeyName' entry to the spec - possibly it needs to re-upload a public SSH key? EDIT: I'm fine with the VPC tagging, it's mainly the IGW name that's bothering me - the SSH key is probably a separate issue. |
Hi @danieljamesscott, thanks for providing the output. I've tested with the specific kops version you were using (git hash Would you be able to test and confirm by building kops off the master branch? |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
I am on 1.8.1 and I am still seeing this issue. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
I'm trying to use an existing VPC to test upgrading from v1.6.1 to v1.7.3. This VPC contains my dev/qa kubernetes cluster running 1.6.1 managed by kops.
I've built the test cluster at 1.6.1 and all looks great. When I run
kops update cluster
(using kops 1.7.0), it wants to make the expected changes but also the following:I think the behavior is wrong. It did not create the VPC or the IGW, it should leave it alone. Is kops expected to support more than one cluster in a VPC?
One more note, I also see the same changes when I run
kops update cluster
with kops v1.6.1.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: