Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update calico policy controller to 1.0.0 #3791

Closed
itajaja opened this issue Nov 7, 2017 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3803
Closed

update calico policy controller to 1.0.0 #3791

itajaja opened this issue Nov 7, 2017 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3803

Comments

@itajaja
Copy link
Contributor

itajaja commented Nov 7, 2017

Out of the box, the calico networking is set up with the policy controller 0.7.0 that doesn't support k8s 1.8 network policy definitions. Is this on the roadmap, and is it as easy as just bumping the image version on the template?

@chrislovecnm
Copy link
Contributor

We need to upgrade it, pretty simple if you would like to contribute

@chrislovecnm
Copy link
Contributor

Which version of kops btw?

@itajaja
Copy link
Contributor Author

itajaja commented Nov 7, 2017

I am running kops 1.7, but deploying a 1.8 k8s cluster. Happy to contribute, do you think is as easy as swapping the current template with the new calico recommended template? https://docs.projectcalico.org/v2.6/getting-started/kubernetes/installation/hosted/kubeadm/1.6/calico.yaml plus/minus adjustments

@chrislovecnm
Copy link
Contributor

Here is an example of a manifest for 1.8 6d624c7#diff-fba0e0542d346bfcca2d1553d1a48b0d

Add new manifest, and update boostrapper

Please use the manifest from the calico repo. We should have rbac rules in the 1.7 manifest

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2017
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

Update calico template

closes #3791 

changes taken from https://docs.projectcalico.org/v2.6/getting-started/kubernetes/installation/hosted/hosted
just a POC. not sure if I should update the 1.6 template or create a new template for 1.8 (maybe 1.7?) as I did. Do you have any suggestions on how to test this?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants