Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor and centralize distribution logic #10538

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2021

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

@justinsb justinsb commented Jan 5, 2021

Use of a struct makes it more sustainable, centralizing into the
distribution package makes it simpler to follow.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/nodeup approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 5, 2021
Use of a struct makes it more sustainable, centralizing into the
distribution package makes it simpler to follow.
klog.Warningf("Unknown distro; won't write kubeconfig to homedir %s", b.Distribution)
users, err := b.Distribution.DefaultUsers()
if err != nil {
klog.Warningf("won't write kubeconfig to homedir for distribution %s: %v", b.Distribution, err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will we start wrapping inner errors via the %w verb?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should yes, but annoyingly klog doesn't yet recognize it (last I checked!), so we have to use %v.

So yes for fmt.Errorf, not yet for klog

@olemarkus
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 50999d2 into kubernetes:master Jan 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.20 milestone Jan 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/nodeup cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants