-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add unit test case for pkg/apis/kops/util/versions_test.go #9156
Conversation
Hi @Hellcatlk. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I'd prefer the grid to explicitly state whether the test case is expecting success or an error. |
@johngmyers , done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Much better. Still a few minor things to fix.
/assign
pkg/apis/kops/util/versions_test.go
Outdated
} | ||
|
||
actual := sv.String() | ||
if actual != expected { | ||
t.Errorf("version mismatch: %q -> %q but expected %q", version, actual, expected) | ||
if actual != c.expected { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will incorrectly pass if the test case expects an error but the function under test returns success and an empty string.
I usually make expectedError
of type string
and put the expected error message in it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test_TemplateFunctions_CloudControllerConfigArgv
shows a pattern where expectedError
is an error
. That appears to be the current pattern in kops.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your comment, But I can't find where the Test_TemplateFunctions_CloudControllerConfigArgv
is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/template_functions_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thx, done.
pkg/apis/kops/util/versions_test.go
Outdated
}, | ||
{ | ||
version: "", | ||
expected: "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You don't need to explicitly list expected: ""
for cases that expect an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
Signed-off-by: ZouYu <zouy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Thanks! |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Hellcatlk, rifelpet The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: ZouYu zouy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com