-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 922
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kubectl should warn when resources aren't found and discovery failed #31
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Prevent issues from auto-closing with an If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten This still looks relevant |
@nikhita: you can't re-open an issue/PR unless you authored it or you are assigned to it. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign |
/reopen |
/unassign |
/sig cli |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Is this a request for help? (If yes, you should use our troubleshooting guide and community support channels, see http://kubernetes.io/docs/troubleshooting/.):
No
What keywords did you search in Kubernetes issues before filing this one? (If you have found any duplicates, you should instead reply there.):
Aggregator
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST? (choose one):
Kubernetes version (use
kubectl version
):What happened:
I set up an API service with the aggregator that had an SSL certificate which was signed with the wrong DNS name. The API service resource had a good status, but I would get 'resource not found' errors from kubectl trying to use it. Eventually with @deads2k's help we found that there were discovery errors against the aggregated API group. See a gist with relevant details here: https://gist.github.com/pmorie/0e8d5ba6c43d0c7000cd05a39a8ae190
What you expected to happen:
I would expect kubectl to warn that discovery failed instead of just saying that the resource didn't exist.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Set up an API service resource with an incorrectly signed cert and try to use one of the aggregated resources.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: