REQUEST: Archive kubernetes-sigs/k8s-gsm-tools #3432
Comments
BenTheElder
added
the
area/github-repo
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
sig/testing
|
SIG Testing notice / consensus thread: https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-sig-testing/c/Y1raklkjFYw Will also raise this in #sig-testing slack. |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
There is also the Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver project that provides an alternate solution if you don't like Kubernetes External Secrets(KES). https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/secrets-store-csi-driver https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/secrets-store-csi-driver-provider-gcp On a sidenote, KES has been deprecated in favour of External Secrets Operator(a go rewrite of KES). I'll log a separate issue in k/k8s.io repo to track that migration as it will impact k8s-infra in the future. |
|
+1 from me. |
|
There's already a test-infra issue tracking that migration, the state of those projects is not a blocker for archiving this incomplete, inactive, and unused project though. |
|
Thanks |
|
Still only +1, this is ready to move forward. Will ping admins. |
Related: kubernetes/org#3432 Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
Related: kubernetes/org#3432 Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
|
Repo has been archived: kubernetes-retired/k8s-gsm-tools If you have any questions please feel free to reopen. Thank you! /close |
|
@ameukam: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Thank you! |
Project archived: kubernetes/org#3432 We never did an image promo for this project. The GCP project still exists and we will deleted manually. Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
Repository to archive
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/k8s-gsm-tools
Repository and/or sig subproject owners that are approving this archival
@BenTheElder (repo root approval OWNER, SIG Testing Chair + TL)
When should this be done
whenever is convenient, following lazy consensus
Additional context for request
This project didn't quite ship to production, and since then we've adopted an ecosystem project "Kubernetes External Secrets" instead:
https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/d16a6c88145bc62fafc1fa4bf6d571c46d64bc27/prow/prow_secrets.md#prow-secrets-management
With nobody actively developing it, and no usage in the Kubernetes project, we should archive it.
I'm going to forward this request to our mailinglist for lazy consensus, I think we should give some additional time given many folks are busy with KubeCon right now, I just didn't want to forget to file this.
Let's move forward after say, June 1st, if there are no objections before then.
/sig testing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: