New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand on slush definition #269
Comments
This is open for anyone who wants to write a quick blurb. @jdumars? |
/milestone v1.14 It's not clear to me whether code slush has served its intended purpose. From what I can tell, it is meant to signal that we aren't accepting any major refactors, but is intended to allow for a higher velocity of code changes than code freeze. Does it simplify things if we just get rid of it entirely? If we keep it around, can we more tightly quantify what is and is not allowed in a way that we can verify the effectiveness of this added process? |
+1 on getting rid of code slush. In the current handbook iteration of bug-triage there's 'early release', 'pre-code-slush', 'code-slush', 'code-freeze' and 'burndown' - I'm in favor of fewer stages with clearer definitions while I'm cleaning up the handbook (#430). In its stead, there can be clearer timelines and boundaries on code freeze - freeze could happen a bit earlier, with a clearer signal, i.e. 'major features should be ideally finished around the first half of code freeze timeslot'. |
Discussed at release team this morning. The experience of previous release team members was that code slush was a useful "code freeze is coming" deadline. For example, some SIGs would wait until code slush to decide whether or not a feature was going to land. Most felt a blast across kubernetes-dev@/twitter/slack would be sufficient for this. The actual mechanism of requiring additional labels and milestones seemed maybe not worth the hassle. Code slush as a concrete phase maybe doesn't need to exist. |
/remove-help |
@spiffxp: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign |
In the 8/30 sig-arch meeting the question was raised on whether api adds could be merged in slush. The consensus was a firm no. This isn't reflected in the current docs and we should consider explicitly calling out types of changes that are restricted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: