-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request approval for specific concepts #13994
Comments
/priority backlog |
We've seen a large number of teams whose workflows don't nicely fit into the LGTM+approve workflow hit this issue, all with specific subsets of the solution they need ... either they want N approvers, or approvers by "type", or both. It might make sense to fix this in a first-class manner (instead of hacking through files) as part of whatever the issue is that we have to track approvers making bad assumptions (I can't for the life of me find it). |
1 similar comment
We've seen a large number of teams whose workflows don't nicely fit into the LGTM+approve workflow hit this issue, all with specific subsets of the solution they need ... either they want N approvers, or approvers by "type", or both. It might make sense to fix this in a first-class manner (instead of hacking through files) as part of whatever the issue is that we have to track approvers making bad assumptions (I can't for the life of me find it). |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Another example: ensure someone from sig-instrumentation gets assigned to PRs that change metrics-related code kubernetes/kubernetes#89788 |
We can't currently use solutions that regex against paths or file types because the approvers plugin doesn't cooperate with filters (ref: #7690) |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
It might be nice to, in some cases, have approval for specific concepts like languages ("is my X code readable") or docs ("approve .md files but not code"). Prow's approval plugin could be extended to do this, via something like:
k/t-i/languages/[go|py|ts]/OWNERS
)k/t-i/languages/go/fakefile
was added)/area prow
/priority/backlog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: