Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert "Add boskos pool for scalability jobs. Move scalabilit… #9567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2018

Conversation

amwat
Copy link
Contributor

@amwat amwat commented Sep 25, 2018

…y jobs from us-central1-f to us-east1-b.""

This reverts commit 1f93fa8.
/cc @krzyzacy @shyamjvs

…y jobs from us-central1-f to us-east1-b.""

This reverts commit 1f93fa8.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/boskos Issues or PRs related to code in /boskos area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config labels Sep 25, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2018
Copy link
Member

@krzyzacy krzyzacy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold
🤞

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 25, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: amwat, krzyzacy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@amwat
Copy link
Contributor Author

amwat commented Sep 25, 2018

/hold cancel
I'll keep an eye on the scalability jobs.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit bc0ec4c into kubernetes:master Sep 25, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@amwat: Updated the job-config configmap using the following files:

  • key sig-scalability-periodic-jobs.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-scalability/sig-scalability-periodic-jobs.yaml
  • key kubetest-canaries.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-testing/kubetest-canaries.yaml

In response to this:

…y jobs from us-central1-f to us-east1-b.""

This reverts commit 1f93fa8.
/cc @krzyzacy @shyamjvs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@amwat
Copy link
Contributor Author

amwat commented Sep 25, 2018

https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-scalability/18163/build-log.txt has cluster creation using the new boskos project_type working.

@shyamjvs
Copy link
Member

I'm still seeing a bunch of issues with Cluster up in some scalability jobs, e.g:

@amwat - Could you take a look?

@amwat
Copy link
Contributor Author

amwat commented Sep 27, 2018

Looks like those cluster up failures are before this fix went in on 09/25. After that all the latter jobs are either passing or flaking on kubetest timeout.

@amwat amwat deleted the scale-bosk branch September 27, 2018 18:30
@shyamjvs
Copy link
Member

We're still seeing failures, even from yesterday (e.g - https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-scalability/18215)
And I think those kubetest timeouts are related to the boskos change. For e.g the run I linked failed due to timing out while trying to create all nodes, which usually happens when there isn't enough quota in the project. And indeed the in-use IP addresses quota seems to be exhausted. Also, I think the limit of 23 explains why 78 nodes were pending to be created (from build-log).

@shyamjvs
Copy link
Member

There seems to be same problem even for this project 'k8s-jenkins-gci-scalability'

@krzyzacy
Copy link
Member

@amwat didn't you ran quota-fixer and unified all quotas?

@amwat
Copy link
Contributor Author

amwat commented Sep 28, 2018

Hmm, the quotas are fixed but looks like some quota requests are under provisioned, I'll add a fix for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/boskos Issues or PRs related to code in /boskos area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants