bump deps, get rid of deprecated types.AuthConfig

[matthyx]

Type

enhancement, dependencies

---

Description

• Refactored Docker authentication configuration to use the new registry package from Docker, replacing deprecated types.AuthConfig.
• Updated Go version to 1.21 and upgraded various dependencies to their latest versions.

---

Changes walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	dockerregistrycredsutils.go Refactor AuthConfig to Use New Docker Registry Package      cloudsupport/dockerregistrycredsutils.go Updated imports to use github.com/docker/docker/api/types/registry instead of github.com/docker/docker/api/types. Changed types.AuthConfig to registry.AuthConfig across various functions. +7/-7      cloudvendorregistrycreds.go Update Cloud Vendor Registry Credentials to Use New Docker Registry Types cloudsupport/cloudvendorregistrycreds.go Added import for github.com/docker/docker/api/types/registry. Replaced types.AuthConfig with registry.AuthConfig for cloud vendor registry credentials functions. +6/-6
Dependencies	go.mod Upgrade Go Version and Update Dependencies                              go.mod Upgraded Go version to 1.21. Updated various dependencies to newer versions. +63/-50

---

✨ PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (852e4a4)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Review

PR feedback
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are mostly related to dependency updates and refactoring to use a new package for Docker registry authentication. The changes are straightforward and do not introduce complex logic.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
🔍 Possible issues	The PR does not mention if the changes were tested in a live environment or if unit tests were updated to reflect the new dependency versions and refactoring. It's important to ensure that the updated dependencies do not introduce breaking changes. The switch from types.AuthConfig to registry.AuthConfig is assumed to be compatible without any issues, but without tests or explicit mention of testing, there's a risk of unforeseen problems in authentication flows.
🔒 Security concerns	No

---

✨ Review tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs By invoking: /review auto_approve The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions

	Suggestions
best practice	Handle errors from secret listing functions to improve reliability.           Consider handling errors from listPodImagePullSecrets and listServiceAccountImagePullSecrets instead of ignoring them. This will help in identifying issues early and ensure the function behaves as expected even in error scenarios. cloudsupport/dockerregistrycredsutils.go [71-72] -listSecret, _ := listPodImagePullSecrets(&pod.Spec) -listServiceSecret, _ := listServiceAccountImagePullSecrets(k8sAPI, pod.GetNamespace(), pod.Spec.ServiceAccountName) +listSecret, err := listPodImagePullSecrets(&pod.Spec) +if err != nil { + return nil, err +} +listServiceSecret, err := listServiceAccountImagePullSecrets(k8sAPI, pod.GetNamespace(), pod.Spec.ServiceAccountName) +if err != nil { + return nil, err +} Ensure consistent error handling across functions for reliability.            Use a consistent error handling strategy for GetImageRegistryCredentials and GetWorkloadImageRegistryCredentials. Currently, errors from workload.GetPodSpec() are returned, but errors from listPodImagePullSecrets and listServiceAccountImagePullSecrets are ignored. cloudsupport/dockerregistrycredsutils.go [111-112] podSpec, err := workload.GetPodSpec() if err != nil { return nil, err } +listSecret, err := listPodImagePullSecrets(&podSpec) +if err != nil { + return nil, err +} +listServiceSecret, err := listServiceAccountImagePullSecrets(k8sAPI, workload.GetNamespace(), podSpec.ServiceAccountName) +if err != nil { + return nil, err +} Initialize secrets at the start of GetImageRegistryCredentials for simplicity. In GetImageRegistryCredentials, instead of checking if len(secrets) == 0 and then initializing secrets, consider initializing secrets at the start of the function. This simplifies the logic and ensures secrets is always initialized. cloudsupport/dockerregistrycredsutils.go [76-77] -if len(secrets) == 0 { - secrets = make(map[string]registry.AuthConfig) -} +secrets := make(map[string]registry.AuthConfig) +// Continue with the rest of the function logic Specify field names when constructing registry.AuthConfig for clarity. When constructing registry.AuthConfig objects, explicitly specify field names for clarity and future-proofing against changes in the struct definition. cloudsupport/cloudvendorregistrycreds.go [220-223] secrets[imageTag] = registry.AuthConfig{ Username: userName, Password: password, + // Specify other fields as needed } Specify exact versions for indirect dependencies.                             Consider specifying exact versions for indirect dependencies to ensure reproducible builds and compatibility. go.mod [37] -github.com/briandowns/spinner v1.23.0 // indirect +github.com/briandowns/spinner v1.23.0 Run tests to ensure no regressions with updated dependencies.                 Consider running tests with the updated dependencies to ensure that there are no regressions or compatibility issues. go.mod [22] -github.com/stretchr/testify v1.8.4 +(Run tests with updated dependencies)
enhancement	Aggregate all errors in GetCloudVendorRegistryCredentials for comprehensive error reporting. For GetCloudVendorRegistryCredentials, consider aggregating all errors encountered during the retrieval of credentials and return them together. This approach provides a comprehensive view of all issues encountered, rather than stopping at the first error. cloudsupport/cloudvendorregistrycreds.go [214-218] -var errRes error +var errRes []error if CheckIsACRImage(imageTag) { userName, password, err := GetLoginDetailsForAzurCR(imageTag) if err != nil { - errRes = fmt.Errorf("failed to GetLoginDetailsForACR(%s): %v", imageTag, err) + errRes = append(errRes, fmt.Errorf("failed to GetLoginDetailsForACR(%s): %v", imageTag, err)) } else { secrets[imageTag] = registry.AuthConfig{ Username: userName, Password: password, } } +} +// Handle other cloud vendors similarly +if len(errRes) > 0 { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("multiple errors occurred: %v", errRes) +}
maintainability	Review newly added indirect dependencies for necessity.                       Review the necessity of the newly added indirect dependencies to avoid bloat and potential conflicts. go.mod [41] -github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify v1.6.0 // indirect +(Review if dependency is necessary)
possible issue	Check new dependencies for compatibility issues.                              Ensure compatibility of new direct dependencies with the project's existing dependencies to prevent conflicts. go.mod [20] -github.com/docker/docker v25.0.1+incompatible +(Ensure compatibility with existing dependencies) Verify updated dependencies for breaking changes.                             Verify that the updated versions of dependencies do not introduce breaking changes or require code modifications. go.mod [26] -k8s.io/api v0.29.0 +(Verify for breaking changes)

---

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success