Feat: support cuex

[Somefive]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 90.90% // Head: 90.35% // Decreases project coverage by -0.55% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (5912301) compared to base (302624c).
Patch coverage: 89.95% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #33      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.90%   90.35%   -0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          15       49      +34     
  Lines         352     1006     +654     
==========================================
+ Hits          320      909     +589     
- Misses         19       58      +39     
- Partials       13       39      +26     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit-test	90.35% <89.95%> (-0.56%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
util/compression/gzip.go	60.00% <60.00%> (ø)
cue/util/string.go	66.66% <66.66%> (ø)
cue/cuex/compiler.go	73.07% <73.07%> (ø)
multicluster/client.go	83.67% <75.00%> (+1.06%)	⬆️
cue/cuex/error.go	77.77% <77.77%> (ø)
cue/cuex/runtime/package.go	77.77% <77.77%> (ø)
cue/util/import.go	77.77% <77.77%> (ø)
cue/cuex/runtime/packagemanager.go	78.43% <78.43%> (ø)
util/singleton/client.go	78.94% <78.94%> (ø)
cue/cuex/providers/http/http.go	80.00% <80.00%> (ø)
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[FogDong]

LGTM, great work!

After the PR is merged, we can add a lint-check action and lint the code.