-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: test parameterKey can update an array #172
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Drew Wells <dwells@infoblox.com>
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #172 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.55% 66.76% -0.80%
==========================================
Files 50 50
Lines 4553 4553
==========================================
- Hits 3076 3040 -36
- Misses 1080 1108 +28
- Partials 397 405 +8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sorry for the late reply, I'm currently at the KubeConCN and will review this after I'm back. |
@@ -74,6 +74,27 @@ func TestInput(t *testing.T) { | |||
r.NoError(err) | |||
r.Equal(s, `99 | |||
`) | |||
|
|||
// test array value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔Is this PR only for adding test cases?
Yeah, I thought it was going to uncover a bug but workflow handles arrays just fine. So this tests that arrays work. |
Description of your changes
ref #171
I have:
make reviewable
to ensure this PR is ready for review.backport release-x.y
labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.How has this code been tested
It's a test
Special notes for your reviewer
Unit test to enforce issue we found in kubevela/kubevela@0.9.6