Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the default hardcodedObsoleteCPUModels #2934

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2024

Conversation

Barakmor1
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
The default ObsoleteCPUModels has changed in kv:
kubevirt/kubevirt@0f4f837

Reviewer Checklist

Reviewers are supposed to review the PR for every aspect below one by one. To check an item means the PR is either "OK" or "Not Applicable" in terms of that item. All items are supposed to be checked before merging a PR.

  • PR Message
  • Commit Messages
  • How to test
  • Unit Tests
  • Functional Tests
  • User Documentation
  • Developer Documentation
  • Upgrade Scenario
  • Uninstallation Scenario
  • Backward Compatibility
  • Troubleshooting Friendly

Jira Ticket:


Release note:

Adding Opteron_G1 AND Opteron_G2 to the default ObsoleteCPUModels

The default ObsoleteCPUModels has changed in kv:
kubevirt/kubevirt@0f4f837

Signed-off-by: bmordeha <bmordeha@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels May 5, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot requested review from orenc1 and sradco May 5, 2024 05:58
@Barakmor1
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @nunnatsa

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 5, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8956121763

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.837%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8938104019: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6058

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Collaborator

@nunnatsa nunnatsa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/cherry-pick release-1.12 release-1.11 release-1.10

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 5, 2024
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nunnatsa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 5, 2024
@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

nunnatsa commented May 5, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.10
/cherry-pick release-1.11
/cherry-pick release-1.12

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.10 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.10
/cherry-pick release-1.11
/cherry-pick release-1.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

nunnatsa commented May 5, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.11

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.11 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

nunnatsa commented May 5, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.12

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.12 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented May 5, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

nunnatsa commented May 5, 2024

/retest

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented May 5, 2024

hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 5, 2024

@Barakmor1: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp 3f364db link true /test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp
ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure 3f364db link true /test hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented May 5, 2024

hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit f2d77b5 into kubevirt:main May 5, 2024
32 checks passed
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: new pull request created: #2935

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.10
/cherry-pick release-1.11
/cherry-pick release-1.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: new pull request created: #2936

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: new pull request created: #2937

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Barakmor1
Copy link
Member Author

@nunnatsa Can we back-port it for 4.14 as well?

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

@Barakmor1 see #2935

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants