Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-0.58]Should remove and restore labeller only from workers #9278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

Barakmor1
Copy link
Member

Currently in some tests we are waiting for
the node labeller to be resumed in any nodes
including unschedulable nodes and that will not work because master shouldn't be labeled by node
labeller.

What this PR does / why we need it:
manual back-port of:
#9215
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. size/S labels Feb 20, 2023
@Barakmor1 Barakmor1 changed the title Should remove and restore labeller only from workers [release-0.58]Should remove and restore labeller only from workers Feb 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@jean-edouard jean-edouard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/retest

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 20, 2023
@iholder101
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2023
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

6 similar comments
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@enp0s3
Copy link
Contributor

enp0s3 commented Feb 21, 2023

/approve
/retest-required

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enp0s3, jean-edouard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

5 similar comments
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@Barakmor1
Copy link
Member Author

@dhiller
Hey Daniel is there a problem with the ci in 0.58?

@enp0s3
Copy link
Contributor

enp0s3 commented Feb 22, 2023

@Barakmor1 Hey, Daniel is OOO today, I will take a look at it

@xpivarc
Copy link
Member

xpivarc commented Feb 22, 2023

/hold
Please make sure you don't need rebase

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 22, 2023
Currently in some tests we are waiting for
the node labeller to be resumed in any nodes
including unschedulable nodes and that will not work
because master shouldn't be labeled by node
labeller.

Signed-off-by: bmordeha <bmodeha@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 22, 2023
@Barakmor1
Copy link
Member Author

/hold Please make sure you don't need rebase

/unhold
I just rebased 1 minute ago thanks :)

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 22, 2023
@iholder101
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2023
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

2 similar comments
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

kubevirt-bot commented Mar 7, 2023

@Barakmor1: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubevirt-e2e-arm64 1869e28 link false /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-arm64-0.58
pull-kubevirt-goveralls a3ca688 link false /test pull-kubevirt-goveralls-0.58

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 9faa3bc into kubevirt:release-0.58 Mar 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants