minor documentation edits and typo fixes #214
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gerred
approved these changes
May 3, 2019
fabianbaier
reviewed
May 3, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While doing this, could we maybe give https://github.com/kudobuilder/kudo/blob/880ec0bb642d2b5bd9720d36ec4c5142fd229726/docs/Comparison.md also some love in this PR?
|
@fabianbaier Can do, but I'll focus on typography and wording for now. I don't know enough about the specifics yet so I can't really improve the content. |
joerg84
approved these changes
May 7, 2019
kensipe
approved these changes
May 7, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This contains some minor edits for readability of documentation, as well as a couple typo fixes.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
I'm not sure an issue is warranted.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Some of the docs pages are pretty inconsistent with respect to addressing the reader: they use "you can do X" or "here we see Y" arbitrarily. I'd love to converge towards "you", addressing the reader directly. Let me know if I can take on this effort as well.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE