-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TODO for paper #2: DPGP clustering analysis #11
Comments
More organized version of clustering figures: |
Anna,
It doesnt make sense to use DPGP clustering across different disconnected
time series. You can use it separately for control and separately for
treatment but not as a concatenation. DPGP has an explicit notion of time.
The control and treatment are not a continuous time series.
…-Anshul.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:42 PM, annashcherbina ***@***.***> wrote:
More organized version of clustering figures:
<iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-
1vTnCBHOiPXMaoTu5hvfSxpDSxaKtWIzAhP4vADhAHhtogBChEovwXvA9qQG
zW7EeM0EhY_axGnDSWCb/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=60000"
frameborder="0" width="960" height="569" allowfullscreen="true"
mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI7EfdL4H4NWWiuQ4O7KJ4s0KlNLBC2ks5szSCPgaJpZM4QNCPA>
.
|
Should we just stick with k-means clustering for DMSO analysis then? |
Kmeans is fine
…On Nov 8, 2017 3:24 PM, "annashcherbina" ***@***.***> wrote:
Should we just stick with k-means clustering for DMSO analysis then?
Or should DPGP be done on the fold change of DMSO vs Control over time?
Really we mostly care about the DMSO vs Control affect, not the time
effect within the DMSO samples or controls separately?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI7EcOm11w4UOjSLgiMvNMqIO-w-UWnks5s0jgQgaJpZM4QNCPA>
.
|
I think Sundari wants the DPGP -- I already sent her those figures, so is it valid if I re-run it on the fold change? I already have kmeans results as backup if needed. |
Dpgp cannot be used for disparate time series because it assumes contiguous
temporal order across the samples as you provide them. So you should switch
to kmeans.
…On Nov 8, 2017 3:45 PM, "annashcherbina" ***@***.***> wrote:
I think Sundari wants the DPGP -- I already sent her those figures, so is
it valid if I re-run it on the fold change? I already have kmeans results
as backup if needed.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI7EV_DyBC4ItGMAI8YzuGR2Q-o_Clyks5s0j0PgaJpZM4QNCPA>
.
|
Yes I know, that's why I suggested the fold change of DMSO vs control. That is a single time series, so why would that be wrong? We basically get the same results with the DPGP & the kmeans though: #7 so I can go with those, but I think the DPGP visualizations are better. |
Ah I see. I didn't realize that's what you meant. I thought you meant fold
change relative to expected background for ATAC. Sure. That would be fine.
…On Nov 8, 2017 3:54 PM, "annashcherbina" ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes I know, that's why I suggested the fold change of DMSO vs control.
So the three timepoints would be
DMSO / Control in earlyG1
DMSO / Control in lateG1
DMSO / Control in SG2M
That is a single time series, so why would that be wrong?
We basically get the same results with the DPGP & the kmeans though: #7
<#7> so I can go with those, but
I think the DPGP visualizations are better.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI7Ea4lF-KdnRbyt2c6Jn_BwmuFopNFks5s0j8egaJpZM4QNCPA>
.
|
Same as we did for hets. Need to run the clustering analysis for DMSO as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: