fix:add check containerd

[ghostloda]

Check whether the containerd is installed. fix #4738

[sweep-ai]

Sweep: PR Review

pkg/checker/host_checker.go

The changes introduce a new validation step in the Check method to ensure that containerd is not installed on any of the specified IPs.

Sweep Found These Issues

• The checkContainerd function returns an error if containerd is installed on any IP, but it does not handle the case where the command fails for reasons other than containerd not being installed, potentially masking other issues.

sealos/pkg/checker/host_checker.go

Lines 98 to 106 in 89749a5

	func checkContainerd(s exec.Interface, ipList []string) error {
	logger.Info("checker:containerd %v", ipList)
	for _, ip := range ipList {
	_, err := s.CmdToString(ip, "containerd --version", "")
	if err == nil {
	return fmt.Errorf("containerd is installed on %s please uninstall it first", ip)
	}
	}
	return nil


View Diff

---

[sealos-ci-robot]

🤖 Generated by lychee action

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	1250
✅ Successful	378
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	871
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	0

Full action output

Full Github Actions output

[sealos-ci-robot]

🤖 says: E2E k8s multi node ARM64 Test Result: ‼️ Failure , E2E k8s multi node AMD64 Test Result: ‼️ Failure
See: https://github.com/labring/sealos/actions/runs/9201147949

[sealos-ci-robot]

🤖 says: E2E k3s multi node ARM64 Test Result: ‼️ Failure , E2E k3s multi node AMD64 Apply Test Result: ‼️ Failure
See: https://github.com/labring/sealos/actions/runs/9201147948

[bxy4543]

🤖 says: E2E k3s multi node ARM64 Test Result: ‼️ Failure , E2E k3s multi node AMD64 Apply Test Result: ‼️ FailureSee: https://github.com/labring/sealos/actions/runs/9201147948

This is just a problem with the testing interface, I will fix it later.