You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since this is the sensible heat for the total unit urban area, shouldn't the obj.treeSensHeat be multiplied by obj.treeCoverage? The obj.UCM.treeSensHeat variable is calculated in the SolarCalcs.m:
As you can see, it only takes into account the sensible, latent, albedo fractions, but not the ratio of trees in the urban area. So I believe when this is summed with the other canyon components in the UCMDef module, it may be overestimating the tree sensible heat load in the canyon heat balance.
I think this is done correctly, earlier in the code, when beginning the derivation of the total canyon Q:
But then, was omitted, when adding the sensible heat components up again at the bottom.
Let me know if I'm missing something here. (the code is sufficiently complex I wouldn't be surprised if this is somehow accounted for somewhere else!) thanks.
Saeran
ETA: Correcting total urban area to unit urban area.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@hansukyang,
In the UCMDef.m module, the canyon sensible heat is calculated from the heat flux of the canyon components this way:
https://github.com/hansukyang/UWG_Matlab/blob/b96bc2a8458ce10990d9bdbea16c5cef17628c50/SolarCalcs.m#L52-L54
Since this is the sensible heat for the
totalunit urban area, shouldn't the obj.treeSensHeat be multiplied by obj.treeCoverage? The obj.UCM.treeSensHeat variable is calculated in the SolarCalcs.m:https://github.com/hansukyang/UWG_Matlab/blob/b96bc2a8458ce10990d9bdbea16c5cef17628c50/SolarCalcs.m#L52-L54
As you can see, it only takes into account the sensible, latent, albedo fractions, but not the ratio of trees in the urban area. So I believe when this is summed with the other canyon components in the UCMDef module, it may be overestimating the tree sensible heat load in the canyon heat balance.
I think this is done correctly, earlier in the code, when beginning the derivation of the total canyon Q:
https://github.com/hansukyang/UWG_Matlab/blob/b96bc2a8458ce10990d9bdbea16c5cef17628c50/UCMDef.m#L141-L148
But then, was omitted, when adding the sensible heat components up again at the bottom.
Let me know if I'm missing something here. (the code is sufficiently complex I wouldn't be surprised if this is somehow accounted for somewhere else!) thanks.
Saeran
ETA: Correcting total urban area to unit urban area.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: