UAS support for dwc2 hcd #35
Labels
Comments
lategoodbye
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2022
After enabling CONFIG_SCHED_CORE (landed during 5.14 cycle), 2-core 2-thread-per-core interAptiv (CPS-driven) started emitting the following: [ 0.025698] CPU1 revision is: 0001a120 (MIPS interAptiv (multi)) [ 0.048183] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.048187] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:6025 sched_core_cpu_starting+0x198/0x240 [ 0.048220] Modules linked in: [ 0.048233] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3+ #35 b7b319f24073fd9a3c2aa7ad15fb7993eec0b26f [ 0.048247] Stack : 817f0000 00000004 327804c8 810eb050 00000000 00000004 00000000 c314fdd1 [ 0.048278] 830cbd64 819c0000 81800000 817f0000 83070bf4 00000001 830cbd08 00000000 [ 0.048307] 00000000 00000000 815fcbc4 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 0.048334] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 817f0000 00000000 00000000 817f6f34 [ 0.048361] 817f0000 818a3c00 817f0000 00000004 00000000 00000000 4dc33260 0018c933 [ 0.048389] ... [ 0.048396] Call Trace: [ 0.048399] [<8105a7bc>] show_stack+0x3c/0x140 [ 0.048424] [<8131c2a0>] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 [ 0.048440] [<8108b5c0>] __warn+0xc0/0xf4 [ 0.048454] [<8108b658>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x64/0x10c [ 0.048467] [<810bd418>] sched_core_cpu_starting+0x198/0x240 [ 0.048483] [<810c6514>] sched_cpu_starting+0x14/0x80 [ 0.048497] [<8108c0f8>] cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x78/0x140 [ 0.048510] [<8108d914>] notify_cpu_starting+0x94/0x140 [ 0.048523] [<8106593c>] start_secondary+0xbc/0x280 [ 0.048539] [ 0.048543] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.048636] Synchronize counters for CPU 1: done. ...for each but CPU 0/boot. Basic debug printks right before the mentioned line say: [ 0.048170] CPU: 1, smt_mask: So smt_mask, which is sibling mask obviously, is empty when entering the function. This is critical, as sched_core_cpu_starting() calculates core-scheduling parameters only once per CPU start, and it's crucial to have all the parameters filled in at that moment (at least it uses cpu_smt_mask() which in fact is `&cpu_sibling_map[cpu]` on MIPS). A bit of debugging led me to that set_cpu_sibling_map() performing the actual map calculation, was being invocated after notify_cpu_start(), and exactly the latter function starts CPU HP callback round (sched_core_cpu_starting() is basically a CPU HP callback). While the flow is same on ARM64 (maps after the notifier, although before calling set_cpu_online()), x86 started calculating sibling maps earlier than starting the CPU HP callbacks in Linux 4.14 (see [0] for the reference). Neither me nor my brief tests couldn't find any potential caveats in calculating the maps right after performing delay calibration, but the WARN splat is now gone. The very same debug prints now yield exactly what I expected from them: [ 0.048433] CPU: 1, smt_mask: 0-1 [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git/commit/?id=76ce7cfe35ef Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
lategoodbye
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 20, 2023
We should pass a pointer to global_hook to the get_proto_defrag_hook() instead of its value, since the passed value won't be updated even if the request module was loaded successfully. Log: [ 54.915713] nf_defrag_ipv4 has bad registration [ 54.915779] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6323 at net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c:62 get_proto_defrag_hook+0x137/0x160 [ 54.915835] CPU: 3 PID: 6323 Comm: fentry Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc2+ #35 [ 54.915839] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 54.915841] RIP: 0010:get_proto_defrag_hook+0x137/0x160 [ 54.915844] Code: 4f 8c e8 2c cf 68 ff 80 3d db 83 9a 01 00 0f 85 74 ff ff ff 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 8f 12 4f 8c c6 05 c4 83 9a 01 01 e8 09 ee 5f ff <0f> 0b e9 57 ff ff ff 49 8b 3c 24 4c 63 e5 e8 36 28 6c ff 4c 89 e0 [ 54.915849] RSP: 0018:ffffb676003fbdb0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 54.915852] RAX: 0000000000000023 RBX: ffff9596503d5600 RCX: ffff95996fce08c8 [ 54.915854] RDX: 00000000ffffffd8 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff95996fce08c0 [ 54.915855] RBP: ffffffff8c4f12de R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000fffeffff [ 54.915859] R10: ffffb676003fbc70 R11: ffffffff8d363ae8 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 54.915861] R13: ffffffff8e1f75c0 R14: ffffb676003c9000 R15: 00007ffd15e78ef0 [ 54.915864] FS: 00007fb6e9cab740(0000) GS:ffff95996fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 54.915867] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 54.915868] CR2: 00007ffd15e75c40 CR3: 0000000101e62006 CR4: 0000000000360ef0 [ 54.915870] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 54.915871] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 54.915873] Call Trace: [ 54.915891] <TASK> [ 54.915894] ? __warn+0x84/0x140 [ 54.915905] ? get_proto_defrag_hook+0x137/0x160 [ 54.915908] ? __report_bug+0xea/0x100 [ 54.915925] ? report_bug+0x2b/0x80 [ 54.915928] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ 54.915939] ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 [ 54.915942] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 54.915948] ? get_proto_defrag_hook+0x137/0x160 [ 54.915950] bpf_nf_link_attach+0x1eb/0x240 [ 54.915953] link_create+0x173/0x290 [ 54.915969] __sys_bpf+0x588/0x8f0 [ 54.915974] __x64_sys_bpf+0x20/0x30 [ 54.915977] do_syscall_64+0x45/0xf0 [ 54.915989] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 54.915998] RIP: 0033:0x7fb6e9daa51d [ 54.916001] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 2b 89 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 54.916003] RSP: 002b:00007ffd15e78ed8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 54.916006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd15e78fc0 RCX: 00007fb6e9daa51d [ 54.916007] RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 00007ffd15e78ef0 RDI: 000000000000001c [ 54.916009] RBP: 000000000000002d R08: 00007fb6e9e73a60 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 54.916010] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000006 [ 54.916012] R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 54.916014] </TASK> [ 54.916015] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: 91721c2 ("netfilter: bpf: Support BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG in netfilter link") Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
lategoodbye
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 20, 2023
The `cgrp_local_storage` test triggers a kernel panic like: # ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. [ 550.930632] CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000080, era == ffff80000200be34, ra == ffff80000200be00 [ 550.931781] Oops[#1]: [ 550.931966] CPU: 1 PID: 1303 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-loong-devel-g2f56bb0d2327 #35 a896aca3f4164f09cc346f89f2e09832e07be5f6 [ 550.932215] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 550.932403] pc ffff80000200be34 ra ffff80000200be00 tp 9000000108350000 sp 9000000108353dc0 [ 550.932545] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000517 a2 0000000000000118 a3 00007ffffbb15558 [ 550.932682] a4 00007ffffbb15620 a5 90000001004e7700 a6 0000000000000021 a7 0000000000000118 [ 550.932824] t0 ffff80000200bdc0 t1 0000000000000517 t2 0000000000000517 t3 00007ffff1c06ee0 [ 550.932961] t4 0000555578ae04d0 t5 fffffffffffffff8 t6 0000000000000004 t7 0000000000000020 [ 550.933097] t8 0000000000000040 u0 00000000000007b8 s9 9000000108353e00 s0 90000001004e7700 [ 550.933241] s1 9000000004005000 s2 0000000000000001 s3 0000000000000000 s4 0000555555eb2ec8 [ 550.933379] s5 00007ffffbb15bb8 s6 00007ffff1dafd60 s7 000055555663f610 s8 00007ffff1db0050 [ 550.933520] ra: ffff80000200be00 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x40/0x200 [ 550.933911] ERA: ffff80000200be34 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200 [ 550.934105] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 550.934596] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 550.934712] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 550.934836] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 550.934976] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 550.935097] BADV: 0000000000000080 [ 550.935181] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 550.935291] Modules linked in: [ 550.935391] Process test_progs (pid: 1303, threadinfo=000000006c3b1c41, task=0000000061f84a55) [ 550.935643] Stack : 00007ffffbb15bb8 0000555555eb2ec8 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 550.935844] 9000000004005000 ffff80001b864000 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029aa034 [ 550.935990] 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 d07d9dfb09721a09 [ 550.936175] 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 [ 550.936314] 9000000101d46ad0 900000000290abf0 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 [ 550.936479] 0000000000000003 9000000108353ec0 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029d7288 [ 550.936635] 00007ffff1dafd60 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 [ 550.936779] 9000000108353ec0 90000000035dd1f0 00007ffff1dafd58 9000000002841c5c [ 550.936939] 0000000000000119 0000555555eea5a8 00007ffff1d78780 00007ffffbb153e0 [ 550.937083] ffffffffffffffda 00007ffffbb15518 0000000000000040 00007ffffbb15558 [ 550.937224] ... [ 550.937299] Call Trace: [ 550.937521] [<ffff80000200be34>] bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200 [ 550.937910] [<90000000029aa034>] bpf_trace_run2+0x90/0x154 [ 550.938105] [<900000000290abf0>] syscall_trace_enter.isra.0+0x1cc/0x200 [ 550.938224] [<90000000035dd1f0>] do_syscall+0x48/0x94 [ 550.938319] [<9000000002841c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 550.938477] [ 550.938607] Code: 580009ae 50016000 262402e4 <28c20085> 14092084 03a00084 16000024 03240084 00150006 [ 550.938851] [ 550.939021] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Further investigation shows that this panic is triggered by memory load operations: ptr = bpf_cgrp_storage_get(&map_a, task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp, 0, BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); The expression `task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp` involves two memory load. Since the field offset fits in imm12 or imm14, we use ldd or ldptrd instructions. But both instructions have the side effect that it will signed-extended the imm operand. Finally, we got the wrong addresses and panics is inevitable. Use a generic ldxd instruction to avoid this kind of issues. With this change, we have: # ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec #48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524 #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL #48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL #48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL All error logs: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524 #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Summary: 0/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED No panics any more (The test still failed because lack of BPF trampoline which I am actively working on). Fixes: 5dc6155 ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support") Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
lategoodbye
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 20, 2023
The `cls_redirect` test triggers a kernel panic like: # ./test_progs -t cls_redirect Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. [ 30.938489] CPU 3 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffd814de0, era == ffff800002009fb8, ra == ffff800002009f9c [ 30.939331] Oops[#1]: [ 30.939513] CPU: 3 PID: 1260 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-loong-devel-g2f56bb0d2327 #35 a896aca3f4164f09cc346f89f2e09832e07be5f6 [ 30.939732] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 30.939901] pc ffff800002009fb8 ra ffff800002009f9c tp 9000000104da4000 sp 9000000104da7ab0 [ 30.940038] a0 fffffffffd814de0 a1 9000000104da7a68 a2 0000000000000000 a3 9000000104da7c10 [ 30.940183] a4 9000000104da7c14 a5 0000000000000002 a6 0000000000000021 a7 00005555904d7f90 [ 30.940321] t0 0000000000000110 t1 0000000000000000 t2 fffffffffd814de0 t3 0004c4b400000000 [ 30.940456] t4 ffffffffffffffff t5 00000000c3f63600 t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000000 [ 30.940590] t8 000000000006d803 u0 0000000000000020 s9 9000000104da7b10 s0 900000010504c200 [ 30.940727] s1 fffffffffd814de0 s2 900000010504c200 s3 9000000104da7c10 s4 9000000104da7ad0 [ 30.940866] s5 0000000000000000 s6 90000000030e65bc s7 9000000104da7b44 s8 90000000044f6fc0 [ 30.941015] ra: ffff800002009f9c bpf_prog_846803e5ae81417f_cls_redirect+0xa0/0x590 [ 30.941535] ERA: ffff800002009fb8 bpf_prog_846803e5ae81417f_cls_redirect+0xbc/0x590 [ 30.941696] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 30.942224] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 30.942330] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 30.942453] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 30.942612] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 30.942764] BADV: fffffffffd814de0 [ 30.942854] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 30.942974] Modules linked in: [ 30.943078] Process test_progs (pid: 1260, threadinfo=00000000ce303226, task=000000007d10bb76) [ 30.943306] Stack : 900000010a064000 90000000044f6fc0 9000000104da7b48 0000000000000000 [ 30.943495] 0000000000000000 9000000104da7c14 9000000104da7c10 900000010504c200 [ 30.943626] 0000000000000001 ffff80001b88c000 9000000104da7b70 90000000030e6668 [ 30.943785] 0000000000000000 9000000104da7b58 ffff80001b88c048 9000000003d05000 [ 30.943936] 900000000303ac88 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000104da7b70 [ 30.944091] 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000731eeab00 0000000000000000 [ 30.944245] ffff80001b88c000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 54b99959429f83b8 [ 30.944402] ffff80001b88c000 90000000044f6fc0 9000000101d70000 ffff80001b88c000 [ 30.944538] 000000000000005a 900000010504c200 900000010a064000 900000010a067000 [ 30.944697] 9000000104da7d88 0000000000000000 9000000003d05000 90000000030e794c [ 30.944852] ... [ 30.944924] Call Trace: [ 30.945120] [<ffff800002009fb8>] bpf_prog_846803e5ae81417f_cls_redirect+0xbc/0x590 [ 30.945650] [<90000000030e6668>] bpf_test_run+0x1ec/0x2f8 [ 30.945958] [<90000000030e794c>] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x31c/0x684 [ 30.946065] [<90000000026d4f68>] __sys_bpf+0x678/0x2724 [ 30.946159] [<90000000026d7288>] sys_bpf+0x20/0x2c [ 30.946253] [<90000000032dd224>] do_syscall+0x7c/0x94 [ 30.946343] [<9000000002541c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 30.946492] [ 30.946549] Code: 0015030e 5c0009c0 5001d000 <28c00304> 02c00484 29c00304 00150009 2a42d2e4 0280200d [ 30.946793] [ 30.946971] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 32.093225] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 32.093526] Kernel relocated by 0x2320000 [ 32.093630] .text @ 0x9000000002520000 [ 32.093725] .data @ 0x9000000003400000 [ 32.093792] .bss @ 0x9000000004413200 [ 34.971998] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]--- This is because we signed-extend function return values. When subprog mode is enabled, we have: cls_redirect() -> get_global_metrics() returns pcpu ptr 0xfffffefffc00b480 The pointer returned is later signed-extended to 0xfffffffffc00b480 at `BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT`. During BPF prog run, this triggers unhandled page fault and a kernel panic. Drop the unnecessary signed-extension on return values like other architectures do. With this change, we have: # ./test_progs -t cls_redirect Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. #51/1 cls_redirect/cls_redirect_inlined:OK #51/2 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: SYN):OK #51/3 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: SYN):OK #51/4 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: ACK):OK #51/5 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: ACK):OK #51/6 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP forward unknown (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/7 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP forward unknown (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/8 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept known (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/9 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept known (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/10 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP accept unknown (no hops, flags: none):OK #51/11 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP accept unknown (no hops, flags: none):OK #51/12 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP forward unknown (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/13 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP forward unknown (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/14 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP accept known (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/15 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP accept known (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/16 cls_redirect/cls_redirect_subprogs:OK #51/17 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: SYN):OK #51/18 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: SYN):OK #51/19 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: ACK):OK #51/20 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: ACK):OK #51/21 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP forward unknown (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/22 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP forward unknown (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/23 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept known (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/24 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept known (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/25 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP accept unknown (no hops, flags: none):OK #51/26 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP accept unknown (no hops, flags: none):OK #51/27 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP forward unknown (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/28 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP forward unknown (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/29 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP accept known (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/30 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP accept known (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/31 cls_redirect/cls_redirect_dynptr:OK #51/32 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: SYN):OK #51/33 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: SYN):OK #51/34 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: ACK):OK #51/35 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept unknown (no hops, flags: ACK):OK #51/36 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP forward unknown (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/37 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP forward unknown (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/38 cls_redirect/IPv4 TCP accept known (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/39 cls_redirect/IPv6 TCP accept known (one hop, flags: ACK):OK #51/40 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP accept unknown (no hops, flags: none):OK #51/41 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP accept unknown (no hops, flags: none):OK #51/42 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP forward unknown (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/43 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP forward unknown (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/44 cls_redirect/IPv4 UDP accept known (one hop, flags: none):OK #51/45 cls_redirect/IPv6 UDP accept known (one hop, flags: none):OK #51 cls_redirect:OK Summary: 1/45 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Fixes: 5dc6155 ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support") Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
lategoodbye
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2024
When we are slave role and receives l2cap conn req when encryption has
started, we should check the enc key size to avoid KNOB attack or BLUFFS
attack.
From SIG recommendation, implementations are advised to reject
service-level connections on an encrypted baseband link with key
strengths below 7 octets.
A simple and clear way to achieve this is to place the enc key size
check in hci_cc_read_enc_key_size()
The btmon log below shows the case that lacks enc key size check.
> HCI Event: Connect Request (0x04) plen 10
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Class: 0x480104
Major class: Computer (desktop, notebook, PDA, organizers)
Minor class: Desktop workstation
Capturing (Scanner, Microphone)
Telephony (Cordless telephony, Modem, Headset)
Link type: ACL (0x01)
< HCI Command: Accept Connection Request (0x01|0x0009) plen 7
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Role: Peripheral (0x01)
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Accept Connection Request (0x01|0x0009) ncmd 2
Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Connect Complete (0x03) plen 11
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Link type: ACL (0x01)
Encryption: Disabled (0x00)
...
> HCI Event: Encryption Change (0x08) plen 4
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Encryption: Enabled with E0 (0x01)
< HCI Command: Read Encryption Key Size (0x05|0x0008) plen 2
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 7
Read Encryption Key Size (0x05|0x0008) ncmd 2
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Key size: 6
// We should check the enc key size
...
> ACL Data RX: Handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12
L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 3 len 4
PSM: 25 (0x0019)
Source CID: 64
< ACL Data TX: Handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 16
L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 3 len 8
Destination CID: 64
Source CID: 64
Result: Connection pending (0x0001)
Status: Authorization pending (0x0002)
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
Num handles: 1
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Count: 1
#35: len 16 (25 Kb/s)
Latency: 5 msec (2-7 msec ~4 msec)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 16
L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 3 len 8
Destination CID: 64
Source CID: 64
Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
Status: No further information available (0x0000)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <alex_lu@realsil.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently the dwc2 hcd doesn't support scatter-gather, which is required for UAS support.
There are plans from Synopsys to submit this feature in Q4 2018.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: