Make QUDA understand memoryType in older ROCms #1445
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Older ROCms (before 5.5) didn't have the memoryType/type union that was included for forwards compatibility, so we're safeguarding in the case where folks are stuck with an older ROCm version.
|
Thanks a lot, this fixes #1432. I can run with force offloading on LUMI-G now. I'm glad this backwards-compatibility introduces only these minimal changes. |
maddyscientist
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2024
|
Thanks for confirming this fixes #1432. I'll merge this PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Older ROCms (before 5.5) didn't have the memoryType/type union that was included for forwards compatibility, so we're safeguarding in the case where folks are stuck with an older ROCm version.
I'm hoping this will help address #1432.