Make BondFunctions BPV and YVBP consistent #1900
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Most
BondFunctions
methods are overloaded, with one version converting its arguments and chaining to a different overload where defaults are handled and then a call made to static CashFlows methods to do the actual calculations -- e.g.BondFunctions::duration()
andBondFunctions::duration()
(v1.33).basisPointValue()
andyieldValueBasisPoint()
have similarly paired overloads, however do not follow the same trampolining pattern: both methods instead directly call upstreamCashFlows
methods.This results in the settlement date not being set correctly -- unless explicitly passed in -- in the overloads not taking an
InterestRate
object when passed to the underlying calculations (settlement
is defaulted in these methods’ declarations).Make these two methods' behavior consistent with other
BondFunctions
methods and add tests to assert parity.