Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

granular balances #2916

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2019
Merged

granular balances #2916

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2019

Conversation

tzarebczan
Copy link
Contributor

@tzarebczan tzarebczan commented Sep 23, 2019

This is a very basic implementation and I'm not happy with the styling. Merging just so we can include it in the first RC but I will spend more time on the styling before we release it.

@neb-b neb-b force-pushed the granularBalances branch 3 times, most recently from 390b03b to e53f243 Compare September 30, 2019 21:49
@neb-b neb-b changed the title [WIP] granular balances granular balances Sep 30, 2019
tzarebczan and others added 3 commits September 30, 2019 18:10
- [ ] Should we only show them if it has a balance? Or keep that are static? i..e if I never publish or create a channel, does it make sense to show me locked in claims?

-[ ] Needs better wording

-  [ ] <3 Sean
bump: redux bump
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants