Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(algebra/module): Add Jordan-Hölders lattice for modules #17226

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

jessetvogel
Copy link
Collaborator

@jessetvogel jessetvogel commented Oct 28, 2022

@MadPidgeon MadPidgeon added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields etc) labels Oct 28, 2022
@MadPidgeon MadPidgeon changed the title Add Jordan-Hölders lattice for modules feat(algebra/module): Add Jordan-Hölders lattice for modules Oct 28, 2022
Comment on lines 10 to 12
structure is_maximal (x z : α) : Prop :=
(lt : x < z)
(bot_or_top : ∀ {y}, x ≤ y → y ≤ z → (y = x ∨ y = z))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the same notion as covby; perhaps @YaelDillies can confirm

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, this is exactly x ⋖ z (import order.cover).

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I will try to replace is_maximal by covby tomorrow!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a version now which uses covby. I am not sure where to leave the additional lemmas, nor what their correct name should be.

Copy link
Collaborator

@alreadydone alreadydone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also conform to the style guidelines (see examples there, though contemporary mathlib uses λ more often than assume):

When defining instances, opening and closing braces are not alone on their line.

When new goals arise as side conditions or steps, they are enclosed in focussing braces and indented (except possibly the last goal, if its proof is much longer than the proofs of the other goals). Braces are not alone on their line.

src/algebra/module/composition_series.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +95 to +98
is_maximal_inf_left_of_is_maximal_sup := λ {A B} h₁ h₂, by {
rw covby_iff_quot_is_simple (inf_le_left : A ⊓ B ≤ A),
haveI h := (covby_iff_quot_is_simple (le_sup_right : B ≤ A ⊔ B)).mp h₂,
apply is_simple_module.congr (linear_map.quotient_inf_equiv_sup_quotient A B) },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be proved for modular lattices.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In fact, this is already a theorem. See inf_covby_of_covby_sup_of_covby_sup_left

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is a start to show that a modular lattice is upper/lower semimodular: modular_semimodular_lattice

@mathlib-dependent-issues-bot mathlib-dependent-issues-bot added blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. A bot manages this label via PR comment. and removed blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. A bot manages this label via PR comment. labels Oct 30, 2022
@YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

YaelDillies commented Oct 31, 2022

Oh I just noticed, this PR was opened from another repo. Could you please reopen this PR from the mathlib repository? You can ask for writing permissions on Zulip.

@alreadydone
Copy link
Collaborator

I think you can change the branch after you create a branch in the leanprover-community repo, and there's no need to open another PR.

@alreadydone alreadydone reopened this Oct 31, 2022
@alreadydone
Copy link
Collaborator

Hmm, seems you can only change the to-branch but not the from-branch. Never mind then!

@YaelDillies YaelDillies removed the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants